Re: Alternative to resource monitor polling?

["Vallevand, Mark K" <Mark.Vallevand@xxxxxxxxxx>]

Is this the correct forum for questions like this?

 

Ubuntu 12.04 LTS

pacemaker 1.1.10

cman 3.1.7

corosync 1.4.6

 

One more question:

If my cluster has no resources, it seems like it takes 20s for a stopped node to be detected.  Is the value really 20s and is it a parameter that can be adjusted?

 

Thanks.

 

Regards.
Mark K Vallevand   Mark.Vallevand@xxxxxxxxxx
Never try and teach a pig to sing: it's a waste of time, and it annoys the pig.

THIS COMMUNICATION MAY CONTAIN CONFIDENTIAL AND/OR OTHERWISE PROPRIETARY MATERIAL and is thus for use only by the intended recipient. If you received this in error, please contact the sender and delete the e-mail and its attachments from all computers.

From: linux-cluster-bounces@xxxxxxxxxx [mailto:linux-cluster-bounces@xxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Vallevand, Mark K
Sent: Thursday, October 15, 2015 12:19 PM
To: linux clustering
Subject: Alternative to resource monitor polling?

 

Is there an alternative to resource monitor polling to detect a resource failure?

If, for example, a resource failure is detected by our own software, could it signal clustering that a resource has failed?

 

Regards.
Mark K Vallevand   Mark.Vallevand@xxxxxxxxxx
Never try and teach a pig to sing: it's a waste of time, and it annoys the pig.

THIS COMMUNICATION MAY CONTAIN CONFIDENTIAL AND/OR OTHERWISE PROPRIETARY MATERIAL and is thus for use only by the intended recipient. If you received this in error, please contact the sender and delete the e-mail and its attachments from all computers.

-- 
Linux-cluster mailing list
Linux-cluster@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster