Actually it does look like the failed node was fenced by the other node: Apr 25 02:51:46 fenced fencing node sdo-dds-nfsnode2.dds.sdo Apr 25 02:52:39 fenced fence sdo-dds-nfsnode2.dds.sdo success However, even after fencing, the working node (sdo-dds-nfsnode1) did not resume the HA_nfs service. The service was in a failed state: [root@sdo-dds-nfsnode1 log]# clustat Cluster Status for ddsnfs @ Sat Apr 25 03:45:11 2015 Member Status: Quorate Member Name ID Status ------ ---- ---- ------ sdo-dds-nfsnode1.dds.sdo 1 Online, Local, rgmanager sdo-dds-nfsnode2.dds.sdo 2 Online, rgmanager Service Name Owner (Last) State ------- ---- ----- ------ ----- service:HA_nfs (sdo-dds-nfsnode2.dds.sdo) failed On 2015-04-29 11:31 AM, Vasil Valchev wrote:
-- -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Robert Jacobson Robert.C.Jacobson@xxxxxxxx Lead System Admin Solar Dynamics Observatory (SDO) Bldg 14, E222 (301) 286-1591 |
-- Linux-cluster mailing list Linux-cluster@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster