Re: daemon cpg_join error retrying

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 29/10/14 06:16 PM, Andrew Beekhof wrote:

On 30 Oct 2014, at 9:06 am, Lax Kota (lkota) <lkota@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

I wonder if there is a mismatch between the cluster name in cluster.conf and the cluster name the GFS filesystem was created with.
How to check  cluster name of GFS file system? I had similar configuration running fine in multiple other setups with no such issue.

I don't really recall. Hopefully someone more familiar with GFS2 can chime in.

# gfs2_tool sb /dev/c01n01_vg0/shared table
current lock table name = "an-cluster-01:shared"

Replace with your device, of course. :)



Also one more issue I am seeing in one other setup a repeated flood of 'A processor joined or left the membership and a new membership was formed' messages for every 4secs. I am running with default TOTEM settings with token time out as 10 secs. Even after I increase the token, consensus values to be higher. It goes on flooding the same message after newer consensus defined time (eg: if I increase it to be 10secs, then I see new membership formed messages for every 10secs)

Oct 29 14:58:10 VSM76-VSOM64 corosync[28388]:   [TOTEM ] A processor joined or left the membership and a new membership was formed.
Oct 29 14:58:10 VSM76-VSOM64 corosync[28388]:   [CPG   ] chosen downlist: sender r(0) ip(172.28.0.64) ; members(old:2 left:0)
Oct 29 14:58:10 VSM76-VSOM64 corosync[28388]:   [MAIN  ] Completed service synchronization, ready to provide service.

Oct 29 14:58:14 VSM76-VSOM64 corosync[28388]:   [TOTEM ] A processor joined or left the membership and a new membership was formed.
Oct 29 14:58:14 VSM76-VSOM64 corosync[28388]:   [CPG   ] chosen downlist: sender r(0) ip(172.28.0.64) ; members(old:2 left:0)
Oct 29 14:58:14 VSM76-VSOM64 corosync[28388]:   [MAIN  ] Completed service synchronization, ready to provide service.

It does not sound like your network is particularly healthy.
Are you using multicast or udpu? If multicast, it might be worth trying udpu

Agreed. Persistent multicast required?

Thanks
Lax


-----Original Message-----
From: linux-cluster-bounces@xxxxxxxxxx [mailto:linux-cluster-bounces@xxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Andrew Beekhof
Sent: Wednesday, October 29, 2014 2:42 PM
To: linux clustering
Subject: Re:  daemon cpg_join error retrying


On 30 Oct 2014, at 8:38 am, Lax Kota (lkota) <lkota@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Hi All,

In one of my setup, I keep getting getting 'gfs_controld[10744]: daemon cpg_join error  retrying'. I have a 2 Node setup with pacemaker and corosync.

I wonder if there is a mismatch between the cluster name in cluster.conf and the cluster name the GFS filesystem was created with.


Even after I force kill the pacemaker processes and reboot the server and bring the pacemaker back up, it keeps giving cpg_join error. Is  there any way to fix this issue?


Thanks
Lax

--
Linux-cluster mailing list
Linux-cluster@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster


--
Linux-cluster mailing list
Linux-cluster@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster

--
Linux-cluster mailing list
Linux-cluster@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster




--
Digimer
Papers and Projects: https://alteeve.ca/w/
What if the cure for cancer is trapped in the mind of a person without access to education?

--
Linux-cluster mailing list
Linux-cluster@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster




[Index of Archives]     [Corosync Cluster Engine]     [GFS]     [Linux Virtualization]     [Centos Virtualization]     [Centos]     [Linux RAID]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite Camping]

  Powered by Linux