Re: corosync ring failure

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 07/24/2014 12:30 AM, C. Handel wrote:

the switch has no load, interface utilization is below 10%, no crc
errors on the ports and no errors in the log. On the same switch a
second cluster (four machines, similiar config) is running fine.

hi,

did you vlan the switches so the two clusters are "logically separate"? if they're on the same VLAN they might interfere with each other...

also i second Michael Schwartzkopff's suggestion of looking into Spanning Tree Protocol (STP). if your switches (i'm assUming you're using two) are not stacked(1), you may be running into that, as well.

hth
yvette

(1) - stacking switches allows for double bandwidth operations, and can eliminate the need / requirement for STP - tho STP may still be in use.

--
Linux-cluster mailing list
Linux-cluster@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster




[Index of Archives]     [Corosync Cluster Engine]     [GFS]     [Linux Virtualization]     [Centos Virtualization]     [Centos]     [Linux RAID]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite Camping]

  Powered by Linux