On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 12:15:31PM +0000, Steven Whitehouse wrote: > Well the logs appear to suggest that one of the nodes at least has been > fenced at some stage. I have to admit that fencing hasn't been enabled in this cluster, 90% of jobs on these 2 nodes are working with other storage that is accessible by NFS. So it wouldn't be okay to reboot a node due to any problems with GFS2. > > It seems that it has happened due to some traffic congestion. > Do you have separate networks for cluster traffic and other traffic? > That will help to prevent this kind of thing. Also you can use tc to > ensure that the cluster traffic will always get through. Oh, yes, I'm going to use a separate physical NICs for interaction with that storage, but it hasn't been implemented yet. Thank you. -- V.Melnik -- Linux-cluster mailing list Linux-cluster@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster