On Mon, Nov 04, 2013 at 09:31:08AM -0500, Digimer wrote: > >>> We are having a node two cluster with manual fencing configuration . > >> > >> An HA cluster with manual fencing is no cluster at all. > > > > No. It is a cluster. But it provides no high availability. > > Let me echo Zama and Michael. > > Clusters without real fencing are not supported. Manual fencing was > dropped because it's not reliable and it is way too easy for mistakes to > happen. > > Please add real fencing. Test it to make sure it works. I expect > things will start working fine then and you will have no trouble joining > a node back to your cluster. The dogmatic attitude against manual fencing is disturbing. It is a perfectly legitimate and useful way to run a cluster as long as it's used appropriately and with an understanding of how it works, the limitations and tradeoffs. Dave -- Linux-cluster mailing list Linux-cluster@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster
