On 03/13/2013 10:29 AM, Bob Peterson wrote:
----- Original Message -----
| Bob,
| Thanks! I notice that kernel-2.6.32-358.2.1.el6 is out -- I
| assume
| that has the fix?
|
| -- scooter
Yes it does.
Bob Peterson
Red Hat File Systems
Hi all,
We got the backtrace again on kernel-2.6.32-358.2.1.el6:
[2013-03-15 12:49:52]Pid: 60991, comm: httpd Not tainted
2.6.32-358.2.1.el6.x86_64 #1 HP ProLiant DL580 G7^M
[2013-03-15 12:49:52]RIP: 0010:[<ffffffffa05536ff>] [<ffffffffa05536ff>]
gfs2_inplace_reserve+0x54f/0x7e0 [gfs2]^M
[2013-03-15 12:49:52]RSP: 0018:ffff881a9b975a58 EFLAGS: 00010297^M
[2013-03-15 12:49:52]RAX: ffff88082f977628 RBX: 0000000000000003 RCX:
0000000003b0044e^M
[2013-03-15 12:49:52]RDX: 0000000003b0044e RSI: 0000000003af74c5 RDI:
ffff88102e488440^M
[2013-03-15 12:49:52]RBP: ffff881a9b975b18 R08: 0000000000000000 R09:
0000000000000000^M
[2013-03-15 12:49:52]R10: 0000000000001000 R11: 0000000000000000 R12:
ffff88102e488000^M
[2013-03-15 12:49:52]R13: 0000000000000000 R14: ffff88048ad06080 R15:
ffff881a9b975b78^M
[2013-03-15 12:49:52]FS: 00007f40e653e7e0(0000)
GS:ffff88105c640000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000^M
[2013-03-15 12:49:52]CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 000000008005003b^M
[2013-03-15 12:49:52]CR2: 0000000000000060 CR3: 0000001c40811000 CR4:
00000000000007e0^M
[2013-03-15 12:49:52]DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2:
0000000000000000^M
[2013-03-15 12:49:52]DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000ffff0ff0 DR7:
0000000000000400^M
[2013-03-15 12:49:52]Process httpd (pid: 60991, threadinfo
ffff881a9b974000, task ffff881c22ab8040)^M
[2013-03-15 12:49:52]Stack:^M
[2013-03-15 12:49:52] ffff88180b1465f0 ffffffffa052e2d0 ffff881a9b975a98
ffff880790959200^M
[2013-03-15 12:49:52]<d> ffff88180b1465f0 00000115a052e2d0
ffff881a9b975b10 ffff88102e488000^M
[2013-03-15 12:49:52]<d> ffff881a9b975af8 ffffffffa052f89f
ffff88082f977628 0000000000000000^M
[2013-03-15 12:49:52]Call Trace:^M
[2013-03-15 12:49:52] [<ffffffffa052e2d0>] ?
gfs2_dirent_find_space+0x0/0x50 [gfs2]^M
[2013-03-15 12:49:52] [<ffffffffa052f89f>] ?
gfs2_dirent_search+0xff/0x1a0 [gfs2]^M
[2013-03-15 12:49:52] [<ffffffffa054b041>] gfs2_rename+0x6b1/0x8c0 [gfs2]^M
[2013-03-15 12:49:52] [<ffffffffa054aab8>] ? gfs2_rename+0x128/0x8c0
[gfs2]^M
[2013-03-15 12:49:52] [<ffffffffa054aad6>] ? gfs2_rename+0x146/0x8c0
[gfs2]^M
[2013-03-15 12:49:52] [<ffffffffa054aafc>] ? gfs2_rename+0x16c/0x8c0
[gfs2]^M
[2013-03-15 12:49:52] [<ffffffff811672cb>] ?
cache_alloc_refill+0x15b/0x240^M
[2013-03-15 12:49:52] [<ffffffffa054aa65>] ? gfs2_rename+0xd5/0x8c0 [gfs2]^M
[2013-03-15 12:49:52] [<ffffffff8118ffdb>] vfs_rename+0x3ab/0x440^M
[2013-03-15 12:49:52] [<ffffffff81191d0a>] sys_renameat+0x1da/0x240^M
[2013-03-15 12:49:52] [<ffffffff81277495>] ?
_atomic_dec_and_lock+0x55/0x80^M
[2013-03-15 12:49:52] [<ffffffff811a1bc0>] ? mntput_no_expire+0x30/0x110^M
[2013-03-15 12:49:52] [<ffffffff8117eaa3>] ? sys_fchmodat+0x73/0x100^M
[2013-03-15 12:49:52] [<ffffffff81186c46>] ? sys_newstat+0x36/0x50^M
[2013-03-15 12:49:52] [<ffffffff81191d8b>] sys_rename+0x1b/0x20^M
[2013-03-15 12:49:52] [<ffffffff8100b072>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b^M
Bob, you mentioned bz 875753, but Steve mentioned bz 908398. Both of
those bugs are closed, so I can't determine if this they are different
bugs, or related in some way. Are both supposed to be fixed in
kernel-2.6.32-358.2.1.el6 or should I put in a ticket and ask for the
kernel with the fix for 908398?
-- scooter
--
Linux-cluster mailing list
Linux-cluster@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster
