Re: CLVM performance

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 2012-10-24T16:38:46, Andrew Holway <a.holway@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Hello,
> 
> Ive been doing some testing.
> I have an iSCSI device that I have set up with CLVM. 
> I have 4 physical hosts, all with top of the range xeons and 144GB ram. 
> I have 12 KVM machines per physical machine with a total of 48 VMs.
> Each KVM is mounted on a LV.
> The performance is not very good.
> I am not a fish.
> 
> Could CLVM be the bottleneck? Especially with so many LV's?

cLVM2 pretty much gets out of the way, except for the
adminstrative/management tasks like adding/deleting/resizing LVs. It has
almost no measurable impact on the IO latency/throughput of the LVs.

It is more likely you're looking at a bandwidth/latency problem on the
iSCSI side. Is the connection clogged? Server side overloaded? Network?

Regards,
    Lars

-- 
Architect Storage/HA
SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, GF: Jeff Hawn, Jennifer Guild, Felix Imendörffer, HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg)
"Experience is the name everyone gives to their mistakes." -- Oscar Wilde

-- 
Linux-cluster mailing list
Linux-cluster@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster



[Index of Archives]     [Corosync Cluster Engine]     [GFS]     [Linux Virtualization]     [Centos Virtualization]     [Centos]     [Linux RAID]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite Camping]

  Powered by Linux