Re: CMAN nodes in different LANs

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 10/17/2012 05:11 PM, Sam Wilson wrote:
> I might be totally missing something but unless you specify
> otherwise doesn't cman require layer 2 connectivity between nodes?
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> Sam
> 

It normally uses multicast, but you can use unicast with newer
corosync (I've not tried this). I am not sure if two nodes in separate
subnets works, I've also never tried this. I have to think it would be
a bad idea, given the need to fast/stable networking.

- -- 
Digimer
Papers and Projects: https://alteeve.ca/w/
What if the cure for cancer is trapped in the mind of a person without
access to education?
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://www.enigmail.net/
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=qzFE
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

-- 
Linux-cluster mailing list
Linux-cluster@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster


[Index of Archives]     [Corosync Cluster Engine]     [GFS]     [Linux Virtualization]     [Centos Virtualization]     [Centos]     [Linux RAID]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite Camping]

  Powered by Linux