From: Kaloyan Kovachev <kkovachev@xxxxxxxxx>
To: Zama Ques <queszama@xxxxxxxx>; linux clustering <linux-cluster@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Digimer <lists@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Thursday, 2 August 2012 1:08 PM
Subject: Re: Creating two different cluster using same set of nodes.
Hi,
On Wed, 1 Aug 2012 22:54:49 +0800 (SGT), Zama Ques <queszama@xxxxxxxx>
wrote:
>
> =====
> Cluster Name: ClusterA
>
> Node1: system1.example.com Priority:1 in Failover Domain
> Node2: system2.example.com Priority:2 in Failover Domain
>
> File System Resource : /data1 - An ext3 file system
>
> =====
>
> Cluster Name : ClusterB
>
> Node1: system1.example.com Priority:2 in Failover Domain
> Node2: system2.example.com Priority:1 in Failover Domain
>
> File System Resource : /data2 - An ext3 file system
> ========================================================
>
> Why not having ClusterA with two failover domains? You do not need two
> clusters - just two failover domains.
Tried as suggested by kaloyan by creating two failover domains instead of trying to create two clusters. One Node (e.g system1 ) has higher priority in one failover domain and the other node (system2 ) has higher priority in the other failover domain. With this both the nodes are in active state which we are trying to achieve .
Thanks All for all the replies and suggestions.
Thanks
Zaman
-- Linux-cluster mailing list Linux-cluster@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster
