dont take any error
and yes removed the method from command (default is onoff)
exact line is at below:
<fencedevice agent="fence_ipmilan" ipaddr="192.168.11.68" lanplus="1" login="clsfenceadmin" name="fence_node1" passwd="clsfenceadmin" power_wait="4" verbose="true"/>
and I tested fencing using manually (making a kernel crash:Digimer note) and command with fence_node node1 .
İt worked and services is relocated properly
thanks
From: Heiko Nardmann <heiko.nardmann@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: linux-cluster@xxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Friday, August 3, 2012 10:40 AM
Subject: Re: fencing issue in 2 nodes cluster
To: linux-cluster@xxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Friday, August 3, 2012 10:40 AM
Subject: Re: fencing issue in 2 nodes cluster
Am 03.08.2012 09:12, schrieb AKIN
ÿffffffffffd6ZTOPUZ:
Hithanks all repiliesI added verbose parameter into fence agent line in cluster.conf according to Heiko (verbose="true",method="onoff")and I read the web link sent by Digimer .I tested fencing using "echo c > /proc/sysrq-trigger" on node1.after that I saw fencing occured and related services moved to other node properly.in this case can we say , fencing is ok ? or also should I use fence_node command on node for being sure?
No errors anymore? Did you reduce the number of parameters as Digimer suggested? Then it would be maybe interesting for others to see your working fence configuration as configured inside cluster.conf.
I would suggest to test a little bit too much than doing not enough testing ... ;-) ... debugging afterwards is more costly than doing testing before ...
So my recommendation would be to test that manually started fencing, too, to see whether any messages/errors appear.
After that you are probably fine ...
Kind regards,
Heiko
--
Linux-cluster mailing list
Linux-cluster@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster
-- Linux-cluster mailing list Linux-cluster@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster
