2-node or degraded 3-nodes?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: linux clustering <linux-cluster@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: 2-node or degraded 3-nodes?
From: Denis Medvedev <a_mdl@xxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2012 13:52:41 +0400

If I will plan to add more nodes later, but have only 2 right now,
is it better to make 2-nodes cluster or degraded 3 nodes?
I recently heard that you cannot add more nodes to 2-nodes cluster without a clusterwide reboot.

--
Linux-cluster mailing list
Linux-cluster@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster

Follow-Ups:
- Re: 2-node or degraded 3-nodes?
  - From: Fabio M. Di Nitto

Prev by Date: Re: Third node unable to join cluster
Next by Date: Re: 2-node or degraded 3-nodes?
Previous by thread: Problems using fence_virt as a fence agent for two kvm guests
Next by thread: Re: 2-node or degraded 3-nodes?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Corosync Cluster Engine] [GFS] [Linux Virtualization] [Centos Virtualization] [Centos] [Linux RAID] [Fedora Users] [Fedora SELinux] [Big List of Linux Books] [Yosemite Camping]

Powered by Linux