On 05/28/2012 04:25 PM, Digimer wrote: > I understand the name 'ha-wg', but I think it's not enough related to > clustering for people to easily connect it. I like that it focuses on > HA, rather than "clustering" which is an umbrella for both HA and HPC. I > like the word "cluster", as it's one of the primary terms users would > use to search, I would think. > > If we must create a new, general purpose name (though I still argue for > "linux-cluster", politics aside), then we should take the opportunity to > choose a name that is user-friendly, easy to connect to open source > cluster. > > This should also be encouraged to be a user-focused list, to help keep > the snr low for devs using their per-project lists, I would suggest. > > How would something like: > > * Open Clustering > * Open HA Cluster > * Other? As an aside; #open-cluster fits nicely on IRC and it's free on freenode. -- Digimer Papers and Projects: https://alteeve.com -- Linux-cluster mailing list Linux-cluster@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster
