Re: Linux-cluster Digest, Vol 97, Issue 5

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Also, it looks like the resource manager tries to disable the IP address when it's a child of the nfsclient resource.  Is that going to be a problem when I have 16 NFS exports hosted on a single IP?

-RZ

On 05/16/2012 11:00 AM, fdinitto@xxxxxxxxxx wrote:
On 05/15/2012 07:33 PM, Randy Zagar wrote:
>         	    <resources>
>         		    <ip address="192.168.1.1" monitor_link="1"/>
>         		    <ip address="192.168.1.2" monitor_link="1"/>
>         		    <ip address="192.168.1.3" monitor_link="1"/>
>         		    <fs device="/dev/cvg00/volume01" force_fsck="0" force_unmount="1" fsid="49388" fstype="ext3" mountpoint="/lvm/volume01" name="volume01" self_fence="0"/>
>         		    <fs device="/dev/cvg00/volume02" force_fsck="0" force_unmount="1" fsid="58665" fstype="ext3" mountpoint="/lvm/volume01" name="volume01" self_fence="0"/>
>         		    <fs device="/dev/cvg00/volume03" force_fsck="0" force_unmount="1" fsid="61028" fstype="ext3" mountpoint="/lvm/volume01" name="volume01" self_fence="0"/>
>         		    <nfsclient allow_recover="1" name="local-subnet" options="rw,insecure" target="192.168.1.0/24"/>
>         	    </resources>
For the <fs resources you want nfslock="1" option too.

>         	    <service autostart="1" domain="nfs1-domain" exclusive="0" name="nfs1" nfslock="1" recovery="relocate">
>         		    <ip ref="192.168.1.1">
>         			    <fs __independent_subtree="1" ref="volume01">
>         				    <nfsexport name="nfs-volume01">
>         					    <nfsclient name=" " ref="local-subnet"/>
>         				    </nfsexport>
>         			    </fs>
>         		    </ip>
For all services you need to change the order.

<fs..
 <nfsexport..
  <nfsclient..
   <ip..
  </nfsclient..
 </nfsexport..
</fs

This solves different issues at startup, relocation and recovery

Also note that there is known limitation in nfsd (both rhel5/6) that
could cause some problems in some conditions in your current
configuration. A permanent fix is being worked on atm.

Without extreme details, you might have 2 of those services running on
the same node and attempting to relocate one of them can fail because
the fs cannot be unmounted. This is due to nfsd holding a lock (at
kernel level) to the FS. Changing config to the suggested one, mask the
problem pretty well, but more testing for a real fix is in progress.

Fabio

-- 
Randy Zagar                               Sr. Unix Systems Administrator
E-mail: zagar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx            Applied Research Laboratories
Phone: 512 835-3131                       Univ. of Texas at Austin

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

--
Linux-cluster mailing list
Linux-cluster@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster

[Index of Archives]     [Corosync Cluster Engine]     [GFS]     [Linux Virtualization]     [Centos Virtualization]     [Centos]     [Linux RAID]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite Camping]

  Powered by Linux