On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 12:13 PM, Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Was that the only change between the two tests?
Yes, that was the only change (the no fencing cluster.conf is below).
Devices, mount options, etc. remained the same between the tests.
Best regards,
Greg
<?xml version="1.0"?>
<cluster name="centralcluster" config_version="2">
<cman two_node="1" expected_votes="1"/>
<clusternodes>
<clusternode name="node1" votes="1" nodeid="1">
<fence>
<method name="single">
</method>
</fence>
</clusternode>
<clusternode name="node2" votes="1" nodeid="2">
<fence>
<method name="single">
</method>
</fence>
</clusternode>
</clusternodes>
<fencedevices>
</fencedevices>
<rm>
<failoverdomains/>
<resources/>
</rm>
<logging>
<logging_daemon name="corosync" debug="on"/>
<logging_daemon name="fenced" debug="on"/>
<logging_daemon name="dlm_controld" debug="on"/>
<logging_daemon name="gfs_controld" debug="on"/>
</logging>
</cluster>
--
Linux-cluster mailing list
Linux-cluster@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster
