If I simulate a physical disconnection with ifdown command in some node, this node reboots with no hassle, but unpluging the cable kills both nodes. I think the first scenario is correct, but the second one is not what I expect.
Thanks for your help the next are my cluster.conf
<?xml version="1.0"?>
[Index of Archives]
[Corosync Cluster Engine]
[GFS]
[Linux Virtualization]
[Centos Virtualization]
[Centos]
[Linux RAID]
[Fedora Users]
[Fedora SELinux]
[Big List of Linux Books]
[Yosemite Camping]
<cluster config_version="2" name="WSGClust">
<cman expected_votes="1" two_node="1"/>
<clusternodes>
<clusternode name="wsguardian1" nodeid="1">
<fence>
<method name="wsguardian1_ipmi">
<device name="ipmi1" action="">
</method>
</fence>
</clusternode>
<clusternode name="wsguardian2" nodeid="2">
<fence>
<method name="wsguardian2_ipmi">
<device name="ipmi2" action="">
--
Att:
------------------------------------
Miguel Angel Guerrero
Usuario GNU/Linux Registrado #353531
------------------------------------
</method>
</fence>
</clusternode>
</clusternodes>
<fencedevices>
<fencedevice agent="fence_ipmilan" ipaddr="192.168.201.220" lanplus="1" login="ADMIN" name="ipmi1" passwd="itac321"/>
<fencedevice agent="fence_ipmilan" ipaddr="192.168.201.186" lanplus="1" login="ADMIN" name="ipmi2" passwd="itac321"/>
</fencedevices>
</cluster>
Att:
------------------------------------
Miguel Angel Guerrero
Usuario GNU/Linux Registrado #353531
------------------------------------
-- Linux-cluster mailing list Linux-cluster@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Halt nodes in cluster with cable disconnect
- From: emmanuel segura
- Re: Halt nodes in cluster with cable disconnect
- From: Digimer
- Re: Halt nodes in cluster with cable disconnect
- Prev by Date: Re: crm issue
- Next by Date: Expanding a LUN and a GFS2 filesystem
- Previous by thread: crm issue
- Next by thread: Re: Halt nodes in cluster with cable disconnect
- Index(es):