Greetings, On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 7:13 PM, Bob Peterson <rpeterso@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > ----- Original Message ----- > The latest/greatest upstream fsck.gfs2 has the ability to recreate > pretty much any and all damaged system structures and system files, > but there's only so much it can do. That's why I suggested trying the > experimental RHEL6 version, which isn't too far out of date from > the upstream version. It's much better at recovering single blocks > that have been overwritten, rather than a group of blocks. It's > actually quite sophisticated in recreating things. > Well, can't we (the Redhat/Centos fanboys) expect a critical Clustered filesystem like GFS2 (Which supports over 16TB on a 64-bit bit systems at least) take a leaf or two from () ZFS on this issue? Of course, I don't support misuse of "dd" on any critical system by anybody. I will make sure that they will not been seen within 100KM radius near that cluster after doing that. Though I am not vindictive, I will "hunt them, chase them" and whatever. Even an alcoholic/drug addict does not do that. Well, above just my IMHO. -- Regards, Rajagopal -- Linux-cluster mailing list Linux-cluster@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster
