Hi COrey, On Feb 3, 2011, at 3:49 AM, Corey Kovacs wrote: > The cluster2 docs outline a procedure for multihoming which is > unsupported by redhat. > Which multihoming method is that? > Is anyone actually using this method or are people more inclined to > use configs in which secondary interfaces are given names by which the > cluster then uses them as primary config nodes. > > For example, on my cluster I have eth0 as the primary interface for > all normal system traffic, and eth1 as my cluster interconnect. > > eth0 - nodename > eth1 - nodename-clu <-- cluster config points to this as nodes.... > > clients access the cluster services via eth0. > > I've seen other configs where people configure the cluster to use eth0 > for cluster coms so that ricci/luci work correctly, but I don't use > those. > > Is there an advantage of one method over the other ? I am just getting started with RHCS, from Sun Cluster. I was planning to use private node host names as the primary cluster communication, using an ethernet bond of two NICs. I was also planning to have Luci available, until I am more adept at knowing what to add to cluster.conf by hand. Does Luci not function when the primary cluster communication is over a private node interconnect? Thanks, Ivan. . -- Linux-cluster mailing list Linux-cluster@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster
