That's not ideal either when Samba isn't too happy working over NFS, and that is not recommended by the Samba people as being a sensible config. Colin On Fri, 2011-07-08 at 17:46 +0100, Alan Brown wrote: > On Fri, 8 Jul 2011, Steven Whitehouse wrote: > > > Currently we don't recommend using NFS on a GFS2 filesystem which is > > also being used locally. > > After much dealing with NFS internals, I would recommend NOT using it > on > any filesystem where the files are accessed locally. > > NFSv2/3 doesn't play nice with anything else which may access the > underlaying disk (including Samba. The only "safe" method is to export > your samba shares from a NFS client elsewhere on the network). > > YMMV. NFSv4 is supposedly better behaved. I've not tested it. > > > > > -- > Linux-cluster mailing list > Linux-cluster@xxxxxxxxxx > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster > > This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and are intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you are not the original recipient or the person responsible for delivering the email to the intended recipient, be advised that you have received this email in error, and that any use, dissemination, forwarding, printing, or copying of this email is strictly prohibited. If you received this email in error, please immediately notify the sender and delete the original. -- Linux-cluster mailing list Linux-cluster@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster
