Re: q about post_fail_delay

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 05/16/2011 06:03 PM, Alvaro Jose Fernandez wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> Do using a post_fail_delay > 0, when triggered, blocks running resources
> on the node, if one is not using GFS? . For example, if one only uses a
> couple of fs resources locally mounted in HA configuration, not shared
> filesystems at all.
> 
> Regards,
> 
> alvaro

I believe that all IO blocks because the cluster is not able to ensure
that messages arrived to all nodes in the same order, as the
silent/failed node stopped responding. This is a trait called "virtual
synchrony".

-- 
Digimer
E-Mail: digimer@xxxxxxxxxxx
AN!Whitepapers: http://alteeve.com
Node Assassin:  http://nodeassassin.org
"I feel confined, only free to expand myself within boundaries."

--
Linux-cluster mailing list
Linux-cluster@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster


[Index of Archives]     [Corosync Cluster Engine]     [GFS]     [Linux Virtualization]     [Centos Virtualization]     [Centos]     [Linux RAID]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite Camping]

  Powered by Linux