On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 6:33 AM, Alawi, Abraham <Abraham.Alawi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > GlusterFS is an awesome solution, provides HA & performance but it has some > limited capabilities too, like it doesn’t support POSIX ACL. Lastly my > 2cents for a clustered file system, it sounds like a sexy solution but if > it’s deployed in a small scale (e.g. < 5 nodes) it might easily become a > nightmare. For small scales HA storage without losing stability I’d > recommend DRBD + XFS/EXT3/4 + NFS. Also don't forget that for any clustered solution (including DRBD), there will be a performance penalty (which comes from cache invalidation, sync writes, etc.) which might or might not be acceptable, depending on your needs. For simple setup I actually suggest you just stick with one or more storage appliance (Netapp if you can afford it, or Nexenta community edition if you want to use common hardware) and optionally setup replication between the storage appliance. -- Fajar -- Linux-cluster mailing list Linux-cluster@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster
