On Tue, Mar 15, 2011 at 11:02 AM, Budai Laszlo <laszlo.budai@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Is pacemaker a supported alternative for rgmanager? Not yet, although it is available as of 6.0 > Starting with which > version of Red Hat Enterprise Linux? > > Thank you, > Laszlo > > > On 03/04/2011 07:06 PM, Lon Hohberger wrote: >> On Sun, Feb 27, 2011 at 06:08:41PM +0200, Budai Laszlo wrote: >>> Hi all, >>> >>> is there a way to define location dependencies among services? for >>> instance how can I define that Service A should run on the same node as >>> service B? Or the opposite: Service C should run on a different node >>> than service D? >>> >> rgmanager doesn't have this feature built-in; you can define >> 'collocated services' by simply creating one large service comprising >> all of the resources for both services. >> >> You could probably trivially extend central_processing mode to do "anti >> collocation" (i.e. run on another node). >> >> The 'follow_service.sl' script is an example of how to do part of >> 'anti-collocation'. The way it works, it starts service A on a >> different node from service B. If the node running service A fails, it >> is started on the same node as service B, then service B is moved away >> to another (empty, usually) node in the cluster. >> >> Alternatively, pacemaker supports this functionality. >> > > -- > Linux-cluster mailing list > Linux-cluster@xxxxxxxxxx > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster > -- Linux-cluster mailing list Linux-cluster@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster