Re: which is better gfs2 and ocfs2?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 12/03/11 23:13, Bob Peterson wrote:
Agreed.  We're abundantly aware of the performance problems,
and we're not ignoring them.

I know Bob, thanks.

(1) We recently found and fixed a problem that caused the
     dlm to pass locking traffic much slower than possible.

Is this rolled into 2.6.18-238.5.1.el5 ?

(2) We recently increased the speed and accuracy of fsck.gfs2
     quite a bit.

Noted and appreciated. I had cause to use them a few days ago.

(3) We also recently developed a patch that improves GFS2's
     management of cluster locks by making hold times self-tuning.
     This makes gfs2 perform much faster in many situations.

Great

(4) We've recently developed another performance patch that
     sped up clustered deletes (unlinks) as much as 25%.

Good. This has been a real cow but at least for this kind of thing users simply tend to go for lunch and let it run.

(5) We recently identified and fixed a performance problem
     related to writing large files that sped things up considerably.
 See question 1 :)

Can I get hotfixes if possible? (el5.6 x64)

AB



--
Linux-cluster mailing list
Linux-cluster@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster


[Index of Archives]     [Corosync Cluster Engine]     [GFS]     [Linux Virtualization]     [Centos Virtualization]     [Centos]     [Linux RAID]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite Camping]

  Powered by Linux