Depends on the application's use of the filesystem and your
processing usage patterns. You should evaluate
both.
We're using 8gbit FC and 1gb private networking between two
pairs (test & production) of 4-node clusters on IBM BladeCenter. We
used RHEL 4 GFS from 2007 - 2010 without issue. Upgraded to RHEL 5u5, then
most of the GFS filesystems to GFS2 without issues (yet).
We'd like to see a working cluster configuration using
GFS2 on KVM guests.
From: linux-cluster-bounces@xxxxxxxxxx [mailto:linux-cluster-bounces@xxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of yue
Sent: Wednesday, March 09, 2011 9:14 AM
To: linux-cluster
Subject: which is better gfs2 and ocfs2?
which is better gfs2 and ocfs2?
i want to share fc-san, do you know which is better?
stablility,performmance?
thanks
-- Linux-cluster mailing list Linux-cluster@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster
