Re: gfs2 v. zfs?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi :)

On Monday 24 January 2011 21:25 Wendy Cheng wrote
> Sometime ago, the following was advertised:
> 
> "ZFS is not a native cluster, distributed, or parallel file system and
> cannot provide concurrent access from multiple hosts as ZFS is a local
> file system. Sun's Lustre distributed filesystem will adapt ZFS as
> back-end storage for both data and metadata in version 3.0, which is
> scheduled to be released in 2010."
> 
> You can google "Lustre" to see whether their plan (built Lustre on top
> of ZFS) is panned out.


But Lustre isn't a clustered filesystem, it's a parallel filesystem. Similar to 
pNFS, PanFS, ... Comparing GFS to Lustre wouldn't be quite right.

   Rafa

-- 
"We cannot treat computers as Humans. Computers need love."

Happily using KDE 4.5.4 :)

--
Linux-cluster mailing list
Linux-cluster@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster


[Index of Archives]     [Corosync Cluster Engine]     [GFS]     [Linux Virtualization]     [Centos Virtualization]     [Centos]     [Linux RAID]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite Camping]

  Powered by Linux