On 12/14/2010 09:50 AM, Jan Friesse wrote: > Steven Dake napsal(a): >> On 12/14/2010 07:51 AM, Jan Friesse wrote: >>> Masatake, >>> > > .... > >>>> Thank you. >>> Regards, >>> Honza >> >> >> I am not changing corosync license to GPL. I think the separate plugin >> works fine, and we can even take up packaging of it in fedora and Red >> Hat variants, if it is maintained in an upstream repo. >> >> Regards >> -steve > > Steve, > I'm not talking about relicensing corosync (it doesn't make any sense > and I would be first against that), but give permissions to that portion > of code (seems to be more or less header files) to use GPL (which also > seems to me like old version without support for NSS). It's same as what > we did for libqb. > > Separate plugin works fine for Fedora, but I'm not sure if it works also > for other distributions. > > > Regards, > Honza What headers are needed? We can likely provide a GPL version of the headers for third party projects to use. One issue is likely the use of libtomcrypt which has a "public domain" license which we did not write nor can re-license. Regards -steve -- Linux-cluster mailing list Linux-cluster@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster
