Hi
using the public interface for cluster communication is never recommended ,
you can add another crossover cable between the two servers , and apply bond configuration between the crossovers connections in this way you can have redundancy for cluster communication
Br,
jacob
using the public interface for cluster communication is never recommended ,
you can add another crossover cable between the two servers , and apply bond configuration between the crossovers connections in this way you can have redundancy for cluster communication
Br,
jacob
On Wed, Dec 29, 2010 at 9:02 PM, Stefan Lesicnik <stefan@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hi all,
I am running RHCS 5 and have a two node cluster with a shared qdisk. I have a bonded network bond0 and a back to back crossover eth1.
Currently I have multicast cluster communication over the crossover, but was wondering if it was possible to use bond0 as an alternative / failover. So if eth1 was down, it could still communicate?
I havent been able to find anything in the FAQ / documentation that would suggest this, so I thought I would ask.
Thanks alot and I hope everyone has a great new year :)
Stefan
--
Linux-cluster mailing list
Linux-cluster@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster
-- Linux-cluster mailing list Linux-cluster@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster