What you can do (at least on rhel5) is create host names for your cluster interfaces (node1-clu for example) and use those names for the cluster config. This breaks the ability to use the management tools though. I would also see other ways to do it for rhel5. -C On Sat, Nov 20, 2010 at 10:41 AM, Colin Simpson <Colin.Simpson@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> > >> > Would this upset things with regards using keeping things the right way >> > around in cluster.conf with regards "clusternode name" and "altname"? >> >> My only real concern is that your SN could get too noisy. Personally, >> I'd advice making it ring 0 and leaving your names alone. That said, >> either *should* work. > > So how do you force cluster comms to a private network in cluster.conf if > the the hostnames are still the main network names? > > I suppose also as I've never seen any reference to ring numbers in > cluster.conf itself. > > Thanks > > Colin > > This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and are > intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are > addressed. If you are not the original recipient or the person responsible > for delivering the email to the intended recipient, be advised that you have > received this email in error, and that any use, dissemination, forwarding, > printing, or copying of this email is strictly prohibited. If you received > this email in error, please immediately notify the sender and delete the > original. > > -- > Linux-cluster mailing list > Linux-cluster@xxxxxxxxxx > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster > -- Linux-cluster mailing list Linux-cluster@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster