Re: Starter Cluster / GFS

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Nicolas Ross wrote:
I see. In that case, I dare say that the writes hitting one disk at a time is normal. It's a volume group, not RAID1 per se.

Ok, that's what I assumed. Is it possible to have best of both world;-) ? That is, strip the data on both disk, using vg (semi raid 0), without using dm, and without using striping at the vg level (vgcreate -i) ?

I'm not sure LVM can do that, but I'm not a big fan of LVM so perhaps somebody else can provide a definitive answer?

I keep thinking it'd be really nice if MD finally got cluster awareness, but that feature has been coming for years and is till nowhere to be seen, so I wouldn't hold my breath for it.

Interesting. If that really is the same GFS2 bug you're tripping that I bumped into 3 years ago and you're on RHEL6b, that is quite concerning. Doubly so if GFS1 support has been completely removed.

How can I confirm that is what is happening ? Can you provide me with a test case ?

Back when I tried using it, it was reproducible by having > 1 dovecot IMAP client running in the cluster with maildirs stored on GFS2. Accessing mailboxes with only 2-3 users used to reliably deadlock it in under 10 seconds. The only cure was a full cluster reboot. IIRC I was told at the time here that the bug was one of the known ones, so I never bothered investigating further.

Gordan

--
Linux-cluster mailing list
Linux-cluster@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster


[Index of Archives]     [Corosync Cluster Engine]     [GFS]     [Linux Virtualization]     [Centos Virtualization]     [Centos]     [Linux RAID]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite Camping]

  Powered by Linux