On 11/15/2010 07:57 PM, Colin Simpson wrote: > Out of interest (for my own setup) does anyone know if there are any > massive negatives to keeping the service config files on a GFS2 volume? > Just seems like a nice lazy approach to distributing them to me, esp as > on GFS2 you have shared storage anyway. > > I maybe thought if a service needs cleanly shutdown (or more likely > checking if it's down on a node might require the config file and the > GFS2 might not have been mounted). I fail to see negatives on that kind of setup. Although, I don't use GFS2 too often, so I try to solve this problem differently. @Gordan, I've tried csync2 and it's a great tool. It works exactly the way I wanted! Thank you very much, I'm prepping it for big push into production environments :) -- Jakov Sosic -- Linux-cluster mailing list Linux-cluster@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster
