Re: is it possible an active-active NFS server?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 





2010/6/28 Gordan Bobic <gordan@xxxxxxxxxx>
On 06/28/2010 11:11 AM, ESGLinux wrote:
Hi All,

I´m going to mount an active-active file server and my first idea is to
mount a NFS service with luci but now I have the doubt if is it
 possible. with luci i have allways mounted Active-Passive services. So,
my question is that.

Any other aproach to get an Active-Active file Server?


Not with NFS, since NFS has no feature to have multiple servers/share. But there is no reason you can't connect half of the clients to the other server.

I haven't realized about it, it could be a solution. 

one thing, I have been investigating about it, and  I have thought it could be possible using Linux Virtual Server (administered with piranha), what do you think about it?


 

If you need client-side multi-homing, GlusterFS can do that.


in this project I only can use red hat certified solutions. I suposse GlusterFS isn't, 

Thanks for your answer

 
Gordan


ESG
 
--
Linux-cluster mailing list
Linux-cluster@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster

--
Linux-cluster mailing list
Linux-cluster@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster

[Index of Archives]     [Corosync Cluster Engine]     [GFS]     [Linux Virtualization]     [Centos Virtualization]     [Centos]     [Linux RAID]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite Camping]

  Powered by Linux