Hi, Did you set fsid= on the export? Which NFS version are you using? Steve. On Wed, 2010-04-21 at 17:00 +0200, ESGLinux wrote: > HI, > > > look at the error that happens when two nodes are writing to the > index: > > > java.io.IOException: Stale NFS file handle > at java.io.RandomAccessFile.writeBytes(Native Method) > at java.io.RandomAccessFile.write(RandomAccessFile.java:466) > at > org.apache.lucene.store.FSIndexOutput.flushBuffer(FSDirectory.java:503) > at > org.apache.lucene.store.BufferedIndexOutput.flush(BufferedIndexOutput.java:84) > at > org.apache.lucene.store.BufferedIndexOutput.close(BufferedIndexOutput.java:98) > at > org.apache.lucene.store.FSIndexOutput.close(FSDirectory.java:506) > at > org.apache.lucene.index.FieldsWriter.close(FieldsWriter.java:48) > at > org.apache.lucene.index.SegmentMerger.mergeFields(SegmentMerger.java:191) > at > org.apache.lucene.index.SegmentMerger.merge(SegmentMerger.java:88) > at > org.apache.lucene.index.IndexWriter.mergeSegments(IndexWriter.java:709) > at > org.apache.lucene.index.IndexWriter.mergeSegments(IndexWriter.java:686) > at > org.apache.lucene.index.IndexWriter.optimize(IndexWriter.java:543) > > I think in this case one node has writen to the index and the other > don´t. Could it be a problem? does GFS anything with this situation? > > > Thanks, > > > ESG > > > > 2010/4/21 Jeff Sturm <jeff.sturm@xxxxxxxxxx> > We use Lucene over GFS (no NFS), but the design of our > application updates Lucene from only one node at a time. > > > > In general applications that utilize POSIX locking can handle > concurrent updates safely on GFS even with multiple nodes. It > wasn't clear to us whether Lucene supports this, however, and > in your case NFS adds a layer to the mix. > > > > From:linux-cluster-bounces@xxxxxxxxxx > [mailto:linux-cluster-bounces@xxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of > ESGLinux > Sent: Wednesday, April 21, 2010 8:22 AM > To: linux clustering > Subject: gfs+nfs+lucene, anyone had tried? > > > > > > Hi All, > > > > > I´m mounting a cluster using NFS over GFS and I´m going to > store a lucene index on it. > > > > > > There are two nodes that write in this index, and I´m worried > about the index corruption. > > > > > > So anyone have implemented something like this? any problem I > can find? > > > > > > Thanks in advance, > > > > > > ESG > > > > > > > > > > -- > Linux-cluster mailing list > Linux-cluster@xxxxxxxxxx > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster > > > -- > Linux-cluster mailing list > Linux-cluster@xxxxxxxxxx > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster -- Linux-cluster mailing list Linux-cluster@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster
