Hi, On Thu, 2010-03-04 at 09:12 -0600, Alan A wrote: > Hello all - GFS2 is what we have deployed. It is fiber channel > connection/HBA to HP XP SAN. > > What workload are you tuning for? The chances are that you'll do a lot > better by adjusting the way in which the application(s) use the > filesystem rather than tweeking any specific tuning parameters. What > mount parameters are you using? > > From /etc/fstab: > /dev/mapper/vg_acct10-lv_acct10 /acct10 gfs > rw,hostdata=jid=0:id=589826:first=1 0 0 The above says gfs not gfs2. I'd suggest using the noatime mount option unless you really need atime support. Using atime is likely to make many operations a lot slower. The stats you've listed don't really tell us much. The question is what the workload is, how the files/directories are layout out, and how they are being accessed from each node, Steve. -- Linux-cluster mailing list Linux-cluster@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster
