thanks for your reply. I am trying to understand what you mean. for
instance, I have 6 clients and 3 GFS servers, they are divided into 3
different groups
client1 GFS server1
client2
client3 GFS server2
client4
client 5 GFS server3
client6
So my question is how to balance the workload between these 3 GFS
servers since they are hosting identical data?
anyone successfully implemented this using CTDB+GFS?
On Mon, Dec 28, 2009 at 4:50 PM, Gordan Bobic <gordan@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Diamond Li wrote:
>
>> But my concern is: if I use HA solution, for instance I have 5 GFS
>> servers, but only one of them is serving nfs service. That means 1
>> server is overloaded, the other are starving in meantime.
>>
>> Is there any better solutions to make 5 GFS servers provide nfs
>> service concurrently?
>
> There is nothing to stop you from having NFS exports run on all of the nodes
> simultaneously. Divide up your clients into groups so that each group mounts
> a different NFS server, and have the floating IP of the NFS servers as a
> fail-over resource.
>
> There are, however, a lot of potential performance issues you will likely
> encounter in such a setup (attribute caching on NFS, lock caching on GFS,
> etc.).
>
> Gordan
>
> --
> Linux-cluster mailing list
> Linux-cluster@xxxxxxxxxx
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster
>
--
Linux-cluster mailing list
Linux-cluster@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster
