Re: lock_dlm but local flocks = true?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi,

On Wed, 2009-12-23 at 15:53 +0100, frank wrote:
> Hi Steve, thanks for your answer
> but I have not put the "localflocks" mount parameter anywhere. Look at 
> "gfs_tool df" output:
> 
> # gfs_tool df /mnt/gfs
> /mnt/gfs:
>    SB lock proto = "lock_dlm"
>    SB lock table = "H-N:gfs01"
>    SB ondisk format = 1309
>    SB multihost format = 1401
>    Block size = 4096
>    Journals = 2
>    Resource Groups = 200
>    Mounted lock proto = "lock_dlm"
>    Mounted lock table = "H-N:gfs01"
>    Mounted host data = "jid=0:id=196610:first=1"
>    Journal number = 0
>    Lock module flags = 0
>    Local flocks = TRUE
>    Local caching = FALSE
>    Oopses OK = FALSE
> 
> it says 'Mounted lock proto = "lock_dlm" ' because that is what I did. 
> So why is it using "local flocks"?
> 
I don't know. What does it say in /proc/mounts? (or what was your mount
command line?)

Steve.


--
Linux-cluster mailing list
Linux-cluster@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster

[Index of Archives]     [Corosync Cluster Engine]     [GFS]     [Linux Virtualization]     [Centos Virtualization]     [Centos]     [Linux RAID]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite Camping]

  Powered by Linux