Hi Anthony, I just filed a RH bugzilla for this problem. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=536902 Could you please also post your compressed quota file to this bugzilla using the steps highlighted in the bug description? Unfortunately, I haven't looked at this problem yet. I hope to pretty soon, though. Thanks! --Abhi ----- "Anthony Uk" <uk-linux-cluster@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > From: "Anthony Uk" <uk-linux-cluster@xxxxxxxxxx> > To: linux-cluster@xxxxxxxxxx > Sent: Wednesday, November 11, 2009 12:23:06 PM GMT -06:00 US/Canada Central > Subject: GFS2: quota file size not a multiple of struct gfs2_quota > > Hello > > I am quite unable to get quotas on my GFS2 filesystem to work > properly. > I have tried to do gfs2_quota reset followed by gfs2_quota init, but > the > latter always comes back with: > > warning: quota file size not a multiple of struct gfs2_quota > > Warning: This filesystem doesn't seem to have the new quota list > format > or the quota list is corrupt. list, check and init operation > performance > will suffer due to this. It is recommended that you run the > 'gfs2_quota > reset' operation to reset the quota file. All current quota > information > will be lost and you will have to reassign all quota limits and > warnings > > I see from the archives that a gentleman named Scooter had the same > issue a while back, but have not found any mention of a fix. > > This takes place both with quota=on and quota=off and without any > processes accessing the file system, and only one node having mounted > > the file system. I mounted the gfs2meta system and the quota file > (after > gfs2_quota init) is always 17668312 bytes in size. > > If I just do reset but no init, and then set gfs2_quota limit, things > > seem to work properly to start with (albeit without the current > contents > being reflected in the numbers) but sooner or later some ridiculous > numbers appear, such as a user having 70 exabytes (I don't have the > exact output any more). > > I might add that gfs2_fsck gives me lots of warnings of the type: > > Unlinked block found at block 952956 (0xe8a7c), left unchanged. > > I don't know whether that has anything to do with it. > > This is under Centos 5.4 x64, kernel 2.6.18-164.6.1.el5 and > gfs2-utils.x86_64 0.1.62-1.el5 > > If there's anything I can do to help get this fixed do let me know. > > Kind regards > > Anthony Uk > www.dataway.ch > > > > > -- > Linux-cluster mailing list > Linux-cluster@xxxxxxxxxx > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster -- Linux-cluster mailing list Linux-cluster@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster
