Why not run the heartbeat resource manager (pacemaker) on top of corosync? Best of both worlds :-) On Wed, Nov 4, 2009 at 5:46 PM, Mark Horton <mark@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > We have an existing cluster that uses heartbeat. We'd like to add > clustered storage and have been looking at gfs2. The issue for us > seems to be that we can't directly integrate gfs2 into our current > cluster because gfs2 uses a different cluster stack. > > Is it advisable to try to run both gfs2 along with a typical heartbeat > cluster. It seems the problem would be the fencing. > > Any thoughts or advice welcome. > > Mark > > -- > Linux-cluster mailing list > Linux-cluster@xxxxxxxxxx > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster > -- Linux-cluster mailing list Linux-cluster@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster
