Hi, On Tue, 2009-10-27 at 10:36 +0100, Jakov Sosic wrote: > On Mon, 26 Oct 2009 09:05:23 +0000 > Gordan Bobic <gordan@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > This may well be fine when you are dealing with large-ish files and > > your workload is arranged in such a way that accesses to particular > > data subtrees is typically executed on only one node at a time > > So If I organize my cluster nodes that every one of them accesses one > specific subtree directory of GFS/GFS2/OCFS2 partition, I would't get > so slow performance like if the access patterns were all mixed up? > > Yes, thats the correct solution to the caching issue, Steve. -- Linux-cluster mailing list Linux-cluster@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster
