Re: vm.sh with and without virsh

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 05 Oct 2009 00:42:08 +0200
jr <johannes.russek@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Hello Miguel,
> I'm aware of that, however i would prefer to use virsh instead of xm 
> especially due to the asynchronous nature of xm and the problems
> (with failed migrations for example) this creates..

What distribution are you using, and what is the version of rgmanager &
cman?

I'm interested in testing virsh too, because I also noticed those
problems with xm (stalling while migrating). I'm on RHEL 5.3.


-- 
|    Jakov Sosic    |    ICQ: 28410271    |   PGP: 0x965CAE2D   |
=================================================================
| start fighting cancer -> http://www.worldcommunitygrid.org/   |

--
Linux-cluster mailing list
Linux-cluster@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster

[Index of Archives]     [Corosync Cluster Engine]     [GFS]     [Linux Virtualization]     [Centos Virtualization]     [Centos]     [Linux RAID]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite Camping]

  Powered by Linux