Hello Lon,
could you please go a little bit more in detail?.
Each NFS filesystem has been exported only once, that means e.g. when I
have activated service_nfs_home, service_nfs_home_fast was not active.
In all the tests IPtables on both servers has been stopped and all TCP
and UDP traffic on the clients to and from the server's real IP and the
servers service IPs have been accepted. I also see no significant
difference to the document
"The Red Hat Cluster Suite NFS Cookbook" by Bob Peterson.
Thanks in advance & Cheers, Rainer
Lon Hohberger wrote:
On Thu, 2009-09-17 at 07:30 +0200, Rainer Schwierz wrote:
Hello,
hmm, meanwhile the fence_apc problem is fixed by a more recent version
of fence_apc.
But the nfs lock problem is still open. Does it mean I definitely
should not use ScientificLinux and switch to Fedora 11 or RHEL5.4?
When doing a multi-export of the same NFS file system on top of GFS,
lock recovery will not work correctly - there's no way to prevent a new
GFS lock from being taken after a failure but before NFS has sent the
lock reclaim notifications, nor is there a way for GFS to respect the
NFS lock reclaim grace period.
I do not know why you would have this particular problem, though - locks
shouldn't randomly "not work at all" just because you take them from a
service IP address vs. the host's real IP. Maybe there's some IPtables
firewall rule in place ?
-- Lon
--
Linux-cluster mailing list
Linux-cluster@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster
--
| R.Schwierz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| Rainer Schwierz, Inst. f. Kern- und Teilchenphysik |
| TU Dresden, D-01062 Dresden |
| Tel. ++49 351 463 32957 FAX ++49 351 463 37292 |
| http://iktp.tu-dresden.de/~schwierz/ |
--
Linux-cluster mailing list
Linux-cluster@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster
