Hi, On Thu, 2009-08-27 at 14:22 +0100, Mike Cardwell wrote: > On 27/08/2009 14:03, Steven Whitehouse wrote: > > >> Are there any plans to make GFS work with FS-Cache? > >> > >> http://people.redhat.com/~dhowells/fscache/FS-Cache.pdf > > > > Not that I'm aware of. I'm not sure it would make any sense to do so, > > Hi. Can you explain why it wouldn't make any sense please? I have a GFS > filesystem mounted over 100Mb iSCSI (I'm not in a position to upgrade > the network speed at this time, but will in future). It's read heavy. > Particular files will be hit very regularly. I just thought it would be > nice if those files could be cached locally rather than repeatedly > pulling them over the network...? > Unless you are doing something to push those files out of the cache, then they will be cached locally anyway. GFS2 is a bit better at doing that then GFS1 though, Steve. -- Linux-cluster mailing list Linux-cluster@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster
