Hi Brem So, does it work successfully? I made some testing before I submitted it to the list and AFAIK i found no errors. What do you mean exactly with "some CLVM strange behaviours"? Could you be more specific? I'm not subscribed to linux-lvm, please keep us informed through this list. Thanks in advance. Cheers, Rafael El lun, 27-07-2009 a las 21:02 +0200, brem belguebli escribió: > Hi Rafael, > > It works fine, well at least when not hiting some CLVM strange > behaviours, that I'm able to replay by hand, so your script is > allright. > > I'll post to linux-lvm what I could see. > > Brem > > > 2009/7/21, brem belguebli <brem.belguebli@xxxxxxxxx>: > Hola Rafael, > > Thanks a lot, that'll avoid me going from scratch. > > I'll have a look at them and keep you updated. > > Brem > > > > 2009/7/21, Rafael Micó Miranda <rmicmirregs@xxxxxxxxx>: > Hi Brem, > > El mar, 21-07-2009 a las 16:40 +0200, brem belguebli > escribió: > > Hi, > > > > That's what I 'm trying to do. > > > > If you mean lvm.sh, well, I've been playing with it, > but it does some > > "sanity" checks that are wierd > > 1. It expects HA LVM to be setup (why such > check if we want to > > use CLVM). > > 2. it exits if it finds a CLVM VG (kind of > funny !) > > 3. it exits if the lvm.conf is newer > than /boot/*.img (about this > > one, we tend to prevent the cluster from > automatically > > starting ...) > > I was looking to find some doc on how to write my > own resources, ie > > CLVM resource that checks if the vg is clustered, if > so by which node > > is it exclusively held, and if the node is down to > activate > > exclusively the VG. > > > > If you have some good links to provide me, that'll > be great. > > > > Thanks > > > > > > 2009/7/21, Christine Caulfield > <ccaulfie@xxxxxxxxxx>: > > On 07/21/2009 01:11 PM, brem belguebli > wrote: > > Hi, > > When creating the VG by default > clustered, you > > implicitely assume that > > it will be used with a clustered FS > on top of it (gfs, > > ocfs, etc...) > > that will handle the active/active > mode. > > As I do not intend to use GFS in > this particular case, > > but ext3 and raw > > devices, I need to make sure the vg > is exclusively > > activated on one > > node, preventing the other nodes to > access it unless > > it is the failover > > procedure (node holding the VG > crashed) and then re > > activate it > > exclusively on the failover node. > > Thanks > > > > > > In that case you probably ought to be using > rgmanager to do > > the failover for you. It has a script for > doing exactly > > this :-) > > > > Chrissie > > > > > > -- > > Linux-cluster mailing list > > Linux-cluster@xxxxxxxxxx > > > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster > > > > > > -- > > Linux-cluster mailing list > > Linux-cluster@xxxxxxxxxx > > > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster > > Please, check this link: > > https://www.redhat.com/archives/cluster-devel/2009-June/msg00020.html > > I found exactly the same problem as you, and i > developed the > "lvm-cluster.sh" script to solve the needs I had. You > can find the > script on the last message of the thread. > > I submitted it to make it part of the main project, > but i have no news > about that yet. > > I hope this helps. > > Cheers, > > Rafael > > -- > Rafael Micó Miranda > > -- > Linux-cluster mailing list > Linux-cluster@xxxxxxxxxx > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster > > > -- > Linux-cluster mailing list > Linux-cluster@xxxxxxxxxx > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster -- Rafael Micó Miranda -- Linux-cluster mailing list Linux-cluster@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster
