Re: Question about performance on gfs2

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Could you mention please, the benchmarks you are using?

Thanks,

On Fri, Apr 10, 2009 at 3:51 AM, Alain.Moulle <Alain.Moulle@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hi

We have executed some benchs on gfs2, gfs compared to ext3 and ocfs2
and the results are (just some examples):
* Read on 1 file   :
        quite the same performance

* Write on 1 file :
        
	quite the same performance

* Creation of many many files and repertories :
        gfs2 is 10 times less good than ext3 and ocfs2

* Write of a file tree followed by 4 reading process : 
        gfs and gfs2 : 40 mn
        ocfs2 : 3 mn
Does it seem normal for you ? or is there some hidden tuning somewhere to increase
performances when using gfs2 (or gfs)  ?

Thanks a lot.
Regards.
Alain


--
Linux-cluster mailing list
Linux-cluster@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster

--
Linux-cluster mailing list
Linux-cluster@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster

[Index of Archives]     [Corosync Cluster Engine]     [GFS]     [Linux Virtualization]     [Centos Virtualization]     [Centos]     [Linux RAID]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite Camping]

  Powered by Linux