On Wed, 2009-04-01 at 17:07 +0200, Gianluca Cecchi wrote: > Conversely, how is it dangerous to have two two-node-clusters with > different names sharing the intra-cluster network? > In particular if one is in production and the other is for testing? > And what about relative multicast-adresses for these two clusters? Can > I safely use same multicast if the names are different or do I have to > change? Ant rule in this case? > > Thanks, > Gianluca > The multicast address/port always should be unique for each cluster or bad things will happen. It uniquely identifies the cluster and nothing else matters for unique identification. regards -steve > -- > Linux-cluster mailing list > Linux-cluster@xxxxxxxxxx > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster -- Linux-cluster mailing list Linux-cluster@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster