On Fri, Mar 27, 2009 at 06:19:50PM +0100, Kadlecsik Jozsef wrote: > Hi, > > Combing through the log files I found the following: > > Mar 27 13:31:56 lxserv0 fenced[3833]: web1-gfs not a cluster member after 0 sec post_fail_delay > Mar 27 13:31:56 lxserv0 fenced[3833]: fencing node "web1-gfs" > Mar 27 13:31:56 lxserv0 fenced[3833]: can't get node number for node e1??e1?? > Mar 27 13:31:56 lxserv0 fenced[3833]: fence "web1-gfs" success > > The line saying "can't get node number for node e1??e1??" might be > innocent, but looks suspicious. Why fenced could not get the victim name? I've not seen that before, and I can't explain either how cman_get_node() could have failed or why it printed a garbage string. It's a non-essential bit of code, so that error should not be related to your problem. Dave -- Linux-cluster mailing list Linux-cluster@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster
