Re: Strange directory listing

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Is that to say that GFS2 is still, 18 months later, not production stable?

On Tue, 17 Mar 2009 10:54:08 -0400, Jon Erickson <erickson.jon@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
> I'm seeing the same wierd listings....any word on what this is or when
> it will be fixed.  I'm using RHEL 5.3
> 
> On Fri, Mar 6, 2009 at 1:59 PM, Bob Peterson <rpeterso@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> ----- "Jeff Sturm" <jeff.sturm@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> | > What level of GFS driver is this?  Are you up2date or running
>> | > a recent level?
>> |
>> | We aren't running Red Hat.  We have:
>> |
>> | CentOS release 5.2 (Final)
>> | kmod-gfs-0.1.23-5.el5
>>
>> Close enough.  :7)  That's a bit old, so it's possible it's the
>> problem I pointed out.  Sounds like it's not hurting you anyway.
>> So hopefully this problem will go away the next time you update,
>> to Centos5.3 or whatever.
>>
>> | The rogue files don't stay around long enough to stat() on all nodes.
>> | My assumption is that these are files just created or in the process
>> | of
>> | being destroyed, and I don't see them in two successive "ls -l"
>> | commands.
>> |
>> | I wasn't too concerned since this doesn't seem to have any negative
>> | impact on the application, but was curious nonetheless.
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Bob Peterson
>>
>> --
>> Linux-cluster mailing list
>> Linux-cluster@xxxxxxxxxx
>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster
>>

--
Linux-cluster mailing list
Linux-cluster@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster

[Index of Archives]     [Corosync Cluster Engine]     [GFS]     [Linux Virtualization]     [Centos Virtualization]     [Centos]     [Linux RAID]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite Camping]

  Powered by Linux