Is that to say that GFS2 is still, 18 months later, not production stable? On Tue, 17 Mar 2009 10:54:08 -0400, Jon Erickson <erickson.jon@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > I'm seeing the same wierd listings....any word on what this is or when > it will be fixed. I'm using RHEL 5.3 > > On Fri, Mar 6, 2009 at 1:59 PM, Bob Peterson <rpeterso@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> ----- "Jeff Sturm" <jeff.sturm@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> | > What level of GFS driver is this? Are you up2date or running >> | > a recent level? >> | >> | We aren't running Red Hat. We have: >> | >> | CentOS release 5.2 (Final) >> | kmod-gfs-0.1.23-5.el5 >> >> Close enough. :7) That's a bit old, so it's possible it's the >> problem I pointed out. Sounds like it's not hurting you anyway. >> So hopefully this problem will go away the next time you update, >> to Centos5.3 or whatever. >> >> | The rogue files don't stay around long enough to stat() on all nodes. >> | My assumption is that these are files just created or in the process >> | of >> | being destroyed, and I don't see them in two successive "ls -l" >> | commands. >> | >> | I wasn't too concerned since this doesn't seem to have any negative >> | impact on the application, but was curious nonetheless. >> >> Regards, >> >> Bob Peterson >> >> -- >> Linux-cluster mailing list >> Linux-cluster@xxxxxxxxxx >> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster >> -- Linux-cluster mailing list Linux-cluster@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster
