Sorry, re-reading that I can see what you mean now. I'll try the patched packages listed in a bit. Gordan On Thu, 12 Mar 2009 16:20:34 +0000, Gordan Bobic <gordan@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > I saw that, but they still seem to be for cman-2.0.98, which I've tried > from the latest 5.3 package, and it's still broken. The bug page Chrissie > pointed at still doesn't list any resolution. > > On Thu, 12 Mar 2009 17:11:32 +0100, Gianluca Cecchi > <gianluca.cecchi@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> On Thu, 12 Mar 2009 11:04:16 +0000 Gordan Bobic wrote: >> >>>>Marc Grimme wrote: >>>> Hi Gordan, >>>> more information can be found in this bug (at least you can get the >>>> information how far this bug goes back). >>>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485026 >> >>> Yeah, I saw that bug entry. The listing says 5.2 and 5.3 are both >>> affected (cman 2.0.84 and 2.0.98). I tried 2.0.73 from RHEL 5.1, but >> you can update to 5U3 and then in comment #86 of the bug referred by >> Marc you have links to download working cman binaries for 5U3. >> >> HIH >> Gianluca >> >> -- >> Linux-cluster mailing list >> Linux-cluster@xxxxxxxxxx >> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster > > -- > Linux-cluster mailing list > Linux-cluster@xxxxxxxxxx > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster -- Linux-cluster mailing list Linux-cluster@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster
