Re: Re: [Ocfs2-users] GFS2/OCFS2 scalability

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Feb 27, 2009 at 11:39:23AM -0500, Jeff Sturm wrote:
> > -----Original Message-----
> > On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 12:46:07PM -0600, Jeff Macfarland wrote:
> > > You *can* but I would use Oracle's filesystem tools for
> > this. OCFS is not posix compliant and thus is not guaranteed
> > to be compatible with tools that expect compliance.
> >
> > 	Excuse me?  ocfs2 is, to my knowledge, POSIX compliant.
> >  I'm not sure what POSIX compliance we're missing, but if
> > there is something, please let us know so we can fix it!
> 
> You're on the wrong mailing list, but...

	How are we on the wrong mailing list?  This is the list about
linux clustering, in a thread about linux cluster filesystems, after all
:-)

> Previous poster described "OCFS".  You're talking about "ocfs2".  Two
> different things, right?

	The thread is about ocfs2.  The poster may have been talking
about ocfs, but I wanted to clarify because either 1) he meant 'ocfs2'
and I want to understand what isn't POSIX, or 2) he meant 'ocfs' and he
may confuse people who are reading for info about ocfs2.

Joel


-- 

"To fall in love is to create a religion that has a fallible god."
        -Jorge Luis Borges

Joel Becker
Principal Software Developer
Oracle
E-mail: joel.becker@xxxxxxxxxx
Phone: (650) 506-8127

--
Linux-cluster mailing list
Linux-cluster@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster

[Index of Archives]     [Corosync Cluster Engine]     [GFS]     [Linux Virtualization]     [Centos Virtualization]     [Centos]     [Linux RAID]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite Camping]

  Powered by Linux