Re: fencing loop in a 2-node partitioned cluster

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



thanks, but where do I have to put the timeout?
Inside fence seciotn of the nodes:
                        <fence>
                                <method name="1">
                                        <device name="ilonode01"/>
                                </method>
                        </fence>

or inside definition of fence devices:
        <fencedevices>
                <fencedevice agent="fence_ilo" hostname="10.4.192.208"
login="fenceuser" name="ilonode01" passwd="rhelclasi"/>
                <fencedevice agent="fence_ilo" hostname="10.4.192.209"
login="fenceuser" name="ilonode02" passwd="rhelclasi"/>
        </fencedevices>

?
It is frustrating to be always impossible to check syntax and
parameters for this cluster.conf mistery file... ;-(

Thanks
Gianluca

On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 4:01 PM, Marc Grimme <grimme@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> We've solved this problem by using fence_timeouts that are dependent on the
> nodeid. Means node0 gets timeout=0 and node1 gets timeout=10. Then node0 will
> always survive. That's not the optimum way but works.
> Or use qdiskd and let it detect the networkpartitioning (whereever it happens)
> and decide which side should survive by a heuristic.
> Marc.

--
Linux-cluster mailing list
Linux-cluster@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster

[Index of Archives]     [Corosync Cluster Engine]     [GFS]     [Linux Virtualization]     [Centos Virtualization]     [Centos]     [Linux RAID]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite Camping]

  Powered by Linux