Re: NFS/GFS performance tuning

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Is this NFS performance to be expected? If so, we can move forward, but I would like to hear one way or the other.

djm



On Feb 19, 2009, at 7:07 AM, David Merhar wrote:

We have the cluster running without problem (RHEL5.3, gfs2). The improvements over the last 6 months are noticeable, and appreciated.

The problem:
Local file access (cluster member) is 160/135 r/w.
rsh access across the network is 130/115.
nfs access across the network is 45/27.

Our test is
dd if=/dev/zero  of=/nfs/mount/test_file bs=1M count=10000
The remote system is also 5.3.

We've tinkered with a whole lot of settings in nfs server/client, gfs2 mount and tune parameters, and the network itself. We've also played with dd flags. Yet we can't cross the 27 Mb/s write threshold. (But we're willing to try again.)

Any advice?

djm

--
Linux-cluster mailing list
Linux-cluster@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster

--
Linux-cluster mailing list
Linux-cluster@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster

[Index of Archives]     [Corosync Cluster Engine]     [GFS]     [Linux Virtualization]     [Centos Virtualization]     [Centos]     [Linux RAID]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite Camping]

  Powered by Linux